![]() ![]() MAILING ADDRESS: Department of Political Science James Madison University 91 E Grace St. Rutherford teaches courses on International Law, International Laws of War, Global Disability Rights, Stability and Recovery Operations, and Global Vitae Reframing the Agenda: The Impact of NGO and Middle Power Cooperation on International Security Policy, with Stefan Brem and Richard Mathew (Greenwood Press, 2003).ĭr.with Richard Matthew and Bryan McDonald (State University of New York Press, 2004, paperback 2006) Human Security and Landmines: International Politics and War’s Hidden Legacy, eds.Humanitarianism Under Fire: The US and UN Intervention in Somalia, (Kumarian Press, 2008).Disarming States: The Global Movement to Ban Landmines, (Praeger Press, December 2010).America’s Buried History: Landmines in the Civil War (Savas Beatie Press, April 2020).Rutherford has delivered presentations in nearly 40 countries and has published in numerous academic and policy journals, including the Journal of International Law and Policy, World Politics and the Journal of International Politics. He has served as the Director of JMU’s Center for International Stabilization and Recovery, a Peace Corps Volunteer in Mauritania (1987-1989), an UNHCR Emergency Refugee Coordinator in Senegal (1989), a humanitarian emergency relief officer in northern Kenya and Somalia (1993), and as a Fulbright Scholar in Jordan (2005).ĭr. and MBA degrees from the University of Colorado, where he was inducted into its Hall for Distinguished alumni. in Government from Georgetown University, and B.A. The website further argued that it should not be treated as the creator of unlawful content.ĬNN has reached out to Reddit for comment.Ken Rutherford is Professor of Political Science. ![]() Reddit claims that it gives all users the ability to flag posts and that it regularly removes images that violate its policies. In court papers, lawyers for Reddit said the site “works hard to locate and prevent the sharing of child pornography” on its website and that its content policy prohibits the sharing of any child sexual exploitation materials. The Question The 2016 Presidential Election was, in a single word, weird. A federal appeals court affirmed the ruling. A Study Of Reddit Politics This article was written for The Data Incubator by Jay Kaiser, a Fellow of our 2018 Winter cohort in Washington, DC who landed a job with our hiring partner, ZeniMax Online Studios, as a Big Data Engineer. The lawyer charged that the website “creates a thriving platform for child pornography and sex trafficking” and that it “knowingly benefits from child sex trafficking through its receipt and distribution of child pornography.”Ī district court concluded that Section 230 bars such claims because it immunizes Reddit. She reported the content to Reddit and said it took days to remove the content but then allowed it to be reposted. In the case at hand, the woman identified as “Jane Doe” in court papers was joined by parents of minors who say their daughters were coerced into providing sexually explicit images that were later posted on the site.ĭoe’s lawyer said in court papers that she was a minor when her then-boyfriend created multiple videos of the two of them engaging in sex, sometimes without her knowledge, and posted them online. “There are other important big tech cases in the pipeline, but this seems to confirm that the justices aren’t going to come back to Section 230 anytime soon,” Vladeck said. “After the justices avoided any meaningful ruling on the scope of immunity for tech companies in the Google case, today’s denial of review in the Reddit case suggests that their aversion was more than just about the Google case, specifically – and that the court is willing, at least for now, to leave any changes to Section 230 to Congress,” said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law. There are probably other state politics reddits, but those are the only ones that I know about. Slightly large and slightly more active: /r/wisconsinpolitics and /r/arizonapolitics/. Edit: Much larger and more active: r/CaliforniaPolitics. Supreme Court rolls back federal safeguards for wetlands under Clean Water Act It's small and not very active: /r/CalPolitics. Supreme Court Building on Apin Washington, DC. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |